This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Elastic Path is the API-first, AI-ready commerce platform for brands with complex requirements: large catalogs, multi-tier pricing, and multiple brands and markets. Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers run account hierarchies, quoting, and negotiated pricing natively, not through bolt-on apps and workarounds.

TL;DR

  • Watson Weekend on Anthropic’s impending IPO: For twenty years, when a company needed software, it bought it. Building was slow and expensive and needed developers, who are cranky (I used to be one). Anthropic’s S-1 shows $16.3B in first-half revenue, mostly from tools that make building cheap.

  • The News You Did Not Know You Needed: PayPal and UPS both raised full-year guidance on October 27, but neither one got there by selling more of its core product.

  • Weekend Reading: Walmart expands Symbiotic deal, and Amazon talks about its retail business.

THE WATSON WEEKEND

Dario Goes Public While Sam Waits

Anthropic made $16.3B in revenue in the first half of 2026. In the same six months of 2025 it made $1.2B. If you sell software, that jump should worry you more than any IPO valuation, because much of it came from coding tools your customers can use to build what they used to buy from you.

The S-1 landed this week with every banker on the planet named in it. I’m not a financial analyst so read this as a commerce guy going through a prospectus. The filing also shows a net loss of $80.7B for the first half of 2026, and I want to know how much of that is cash before I believe anyone’s adjusted version of it.

The S-1 leaves the share count and price range blank, so the $2 trillion headline isn’t in it. The $100B raise at $1.5T to $2T comes from the Wall Street Journal, which also reports a Nasdaq listing under ANT as soon as the week of November 16. I’d treat those numbers as what bankers are telling reporters. For scale, Anthropic’s last private round in May valued it at $965B.

For commerce, this matters because of what it does to software buying.

For twenty years the choice was buy, build or partner, and building usually lost. You had to hire developers, manage them and wait on them. I say that as a former developer, and we are a cranky bunch. That pain protected a lot of SaaS companies, because building your own was slower and more expensive than paying per seat.

My line on the show this week was that buy, build, partner is out and build is in. Marketing teams think they can build software now, and some of them can.

Jess pushed back, and she’s mostly right. Nobody is ripping out NetSuite or Salesforce because someone vibe coded a dashboard over a weekend. Systems of record, the places that tell you how many customers you actually have, are hard to replace and expensive to get wrong.

I’d worry about the single-purpose tools that schedule a report or reformat a product feed, each with its own per-seat bill. A customer can rebuild those in a month. There’s already a website that lets a prospect paste in a vendor’s URL and ask whether the whole product is a markdown file, and software reps should be nervous about it.

OpenAI is going the other way. Sam Altman has said 2026 isn’t the year for an IPO, and Bloomberg reports OpenAI is raising at least $30B privately at around $1.4T. Jess calls it the Apple play, where you let the other guy go first and learn from his mistakes. I think waiting is a mistake. If Anthropic prices first, investors will measure OpenAI against Anthropic’s numbers, and Anthropic writes the first public story of what an AI software company looks like.

Jess still thinks Sam has something up his sleeve. The roadshow will show whether investors side with her or with me. The software question will take longer. I expect the systems of record to be fine. I’m less sure about the dozen smaller tools running on top of them, and I think a lot of retail teams will find out what they’re worth at their next renewal.

Which tool in your stack would you cancel if someone on your team could rebuild it in a month? Hit reply and tell me.

LISTEN TO THE LATEST WATSON WEEKEND EPISODE

THE NEWS YOU DID NOT KNOW YOU NEEDED

PayPal Grew Revenue 2% While Venmo Debit Actives Jumped More Than 55%

PayPal and UPS both reported on October 27 and both raised full-year guidance, but neither one got there by selling more of its core product.

UPS moved about 3% fewer U.S. packages a day and charged 6.1% more for each one. Adjusted cost per piece rose 5.5%, so most of that price increase went back into the network. Carol Tomé says a little over 100 customers account for about 80% of the holiday surge. She expects daily volume to rise about 25% from Q3 to Q4, which depends on those shippers hitting their own forecasts.

Tomé also put the data center logistics opportunity at $15B a year. If you can’t make the picks and shovels, at least you can drive them around. UPS won’t say what that business brings in today, and I don’t know yet whether Wall Street will give it any credit.

PayPal moved 6% more money and grew revenue 2%. Branded checkout has grown 1% to 2% for four straight quarters. Venmo looks very different. Venmo debit card monthly actives are up more than 55%, and Pay with Venmo grew 43%. Enrique Lores says only 23% of Venmo users take a financial product, and he sees a 4 to 5 times gap in revenue per account compared with peers.

The first analyst question on the call mentioned the offers that were on the table, and management didn’t push back. PayPal spent $1.5B on buybacks in the quarter, more than the $1.4B it generated in free cash flow.

I think PayPal is a boat anchor on Venmo. Stripe would know what to do with it, Shopify could bring real in-store payments expertise, and I wouldn’t rule out a hyperscaler. PayPal seems to be holding out for a high price. I’d like to know who the suitor is.

WEEKEND READING