When you look at Home Depot’s Q4 2025 results, you have to look past the unfavorable calendar shift excuses and get into the real story: the battle for the Pro wallet and the reality of a housing market that’s still stuck.

The headline numbers certainly look like a retreat—sales fell 3.8% to $38.2B. But don't let the surface-level decline fool you. Remember, 2024 had that extra 14th week that padded the books by $2.5B. When you normalize for that, the story changes. Comparable sales actually ticked up 0.4%. In this housing environment it is at least incrementally better than you might have thought.

Ted Decker and his team are doubling down on the complex Pro customer, and the SRS Distribution acquisition is the centerpiece of that strategy. With over 1,250 SRS locations now in the fold, Home Depot isn’t just selling hammers; they are selling supply chain infrastructure. Unlike a consumer that can just pause a project, a professional contractor needs a deeper partnership and services to ensure their projects and job sites run well. That’s a moat that Amazon still hasn't figured out how to cross: the land beyond just providing the products themselves.

Home Depot continues to move into the territory once reserved for value-added resellers and distributors. A trend which is not unique to this home sector.

Transactions fell 1.6% in Q4, but the average ticket rose 2.4% to $91.28. This is the classic "high-quality revenue" play. You’re seeing fewer casual browsers walking the aisles for a single lightbulb, but the customers who are showing up are spending more.

Those with money are spending. Those without are being choiceful.

Management noted a lack of "storm activity" and "ongoing consumer uncertainty." Translation: People aren't moving, so they aren't doing the massive "new home" gut-renovations. However, Decker’s comment about the underlying demand being "relatively stable" is key. People are choosing to stay and maintain what they have, rather than trading up.

If you can’t be with the one you love, love the one you’re with?

Guiding for 2.5% to 4.5% total sales growth in 2026 is a prove it forecast. They are planning to open 15 new stores, but the real growth has to come from comparable sales (guided at flat to 2%). They are essentially betting that the housing market thaw begins in the back half of the year.

Is hope a strategy, or are there actual reasons for this relatively bullish forecast?

Home Depot is playing the long game. They increased the dividend (156 consecutive quarters—talk about a track record), and they are investing in Agentic AI and Material List Builders to make the Pros’ lives easier.

You’ve probably seen the report making the rounds last week from Citrini Research. It’s titled The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis. Even if you don’t believe the headlines, it’s still an interesting thought piece and could indicate that the retail and eCommerce landscape is headed for a structural reset.

The core of the Citrini argument is something they call the Intelligence Displacement Spiral. Starting now, in 2026, companies aren't just using AI to help workers; they’re using it to replace them. At the micro-level, it’s individually rational:

The economic fly in the ointment? Machines don’t buy stuff.

Citrini calls this Ghost GDP. It’s a world where productivity is through the roof, but the velocity of money flatlines because 70% of our economy—the consumer part—is built on humans having discretionary income.

For my friends in SaaS and eCommerce, it does pay to read their Frictionless Commerce warning.

Citrini predicts that by 2027, AI agents will handle your subscriptions, your price comparisons, and your negotiations.

2027? Really? That’s next year. In an era where 97% of agentic pilots have failed, this feels a bit much to me.

What seems to be in hyperdrive is business uptake of AI to shave costs and boost margins. What still feels experimental is consumer usage beyond search and discovery.

While it’s unclear what short positions Citrini holds which may have motivated their memo, the thought experiment is still worth paying attention to.

The doomer business scenario is certainly possible (if not probable), as companies are often shortsighted in terms of how they look at their future prospects.

The consumer piece still feels like a ways off, no matter how fast AI is accelerating, it’s still used by (drumroll) consumers that are notoriously slow to form new habits.