Tariffs are shifting. De minimis rules are under pressure. And new enforcement could change how retailers operate overnight. If you sell across borders—through ecommerce, marketplaces, or direct—these changes don’t just impact compliance. They impact your pricing, margins, and conversion rates.

Register for our Trade and Tariff webinar series for regular updates.

I spend most of my time telling people to decode the noise. This week, I talked with Christina Hagopian, who has run her own brand strategy practice for 24 years, and the conversation reframed what "the noise" even is. Here are the three things I'm still thinking about.

Christina's definition is the cleanest I've heard: a brand is what people think and feel about your company before your message even lands. Not the colors. Not the wordmark. The whole system underneath, tied back to your mission, your vision, your values.

Most operators get this backwards. They commission a logo, pick a palette, and call it a brand. That's the sizzle. The brand is the steak, and it exists whether you built it on purpose or not. You don't get to opt out of having one. You only get to decide whether you shaped it.

I came into this expecting the usual "AI is coming for creative jobs" line. Christina drew a sharper distinction. AI is genuinely useful for the early, grinding parts of the work: brainstorming, competitive audits, exploring brand voice, drafting positioning statements, throwing out naming ideas. Use it there, and you'll save real hours.

But its output is an average of everything that already exists. That's a structural problem, not a temporary one. You can't build a trademarkable logo out of the means of what's already in the market, because the whole point of a mark is that it's yours. She told a story about AI failing to reproduce accurate REM sleep brain waves for a medical client. Close enough, except the work has to be true, and "close enough" is exactly what an average gives you.

So the floor is rising. Generic design work is getting commoditized fast. The premium is moving to people who have an actual point of view, which AI cannot manufacture for you.

This is where it all connected for me. The reason you can't cut through digital noise isn't that you're not posting enough or spending enough. It's that you sound like everyone else, because your brand is weak or borrowed or unexamined.

A brand is the foundation. Marketing is what you build on top of it. If the foundation doesn't hold, the spend on top won't hold either, and you'll keep wondering why performance plateaus while you blame the channel.

Here's my takeaway as an operator: before you audit your media mix, audit your point of view. Most companies have a media problem they think they can buy their way out of. What they actually have is a differentiation problem.

The fear about AI in branding is aimed at the wrong target. Yes, it will eat the commodity work, the average logo, the generic palette, the positioning statement that sounds like fifty others. If that's what your brand was, you were already in trouble.

What AI can't do is give you a point of view. It can't decide what you stand for or why anyone should care. That's still human work, and Christina's 24 years are proof that it's harder and more valuable than it looks.

Do the unglamorous thing first. Get clear on what you actually stand for before you spend another dollar on the layer that sits on top. Most companies have it backward, and it shows